Paranormal Activity: Viral Marketing At Its Best Nick Butler, October 27, 2009January 8, 2010 The success of Paranormal Activity will be studied extensively by Hollywood, that’s for sure. Made for a mere $15,000, Paranormal Activity has grossed nearly $64 million since its nation-wide release. How? A strange thing called . . . The Internets!While MovieViral normally focuses on the “in-game” side of viral marketing, we also acknowledge the raw definition of viral marketing, which is the advertising of a film through word-of-mouth (or emails, twitter, etc.). It’s well known that Paranormal Activity did this really well. But we’re going to take a look at what they did right, and what they did wrong.Their main focus was on social networks, like twitter. They encouraged the people who have seen it (during it’s limited release) to “Tweet Their Screams,” basically to write reviews. Almost all of the reviews were good (and only 140 characters long, which doesn’t leave room for much criticism) which lead to the larger limited release, mainly focused on college towns.After Paramount saw the success in those few towns, they knew they had to get this film out on a larger scale. They allowed users to “demand” the film in their town, giving us (the users) the power to decide where this film will play next. In the mean time, Paramount said if they react 1 million “demands” they would release it nationally. And not too surprisingly, it did.“Paranormal Activity” has been on the trending topics of twitter for a few weeks now, which both testifies to the marketer’s success well as the film’s success. Oh, did I mention it beat out “Saw XVIXIVII” for the #1 spot?So, what did they do wrong? To be honest, I can’t think of anything they did wrong. There may be something they didn’t do (like an in-game viral site), but look at the success of the campaign and then tell me that an in-game viral site could made it any more successful.What will this lead to? Well a lot of studios will be turning to viral marketing, that’s for sure. Between this and District 9, viral marketing has proven to benefit low budget films (albeit Paranormal Activity benefited a LOT more). It’s cheap and effective – at least until it becomes overused, at which point it will seem like just another advertisement in a magazine. Marketers are just beginning to understand how to adequately use the internets for advertising.The summary: Viral marketing has proven time and time again to be an effective way to advertise, at least when it’s done right.What did you think of Paranormal Activity and it’s marketing campaign? How did you find out about the film – was it through twitter? Did you think they did something wrong? Discuss it below and on our forum. Viral Marketing paranormal activity
“I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here Experience” Is the Most Extreme Teambuilding Event Ever November 22, 2012November 22, 2012Are you an office manager looking for ways to bring your employees together? Are you having trouble finding a good teambuilding event that will get their competitive juices flowing? Maybe you should try eating bugs. That’s what one event agency is offering in the UK. Called the “I’m A Celebrity… Read More
SNL Takes On “The Walking Dead” And More March 3, 2013Last night, comedian Kevin Hart hosted Saturday Night Live on NBC, and while there were plenty of funny sketches, there were a few that movie and television fans like us will particularly like. After break, watch Hart and the cast take on The Walking Dead, Shark Tank, and more. Read More
Create Your Own Pub Sign for “The World’s End” June 26, 2013In Edgar Wright’s The World’s End, five childhood friends reunite in their hometown after twenty years to repeat a legendary pub crawl from their youth that they failed. However, as the night goes on, they realize that robots are taking over the town. Every good pub needs an equally good… Read More
I agree Nick. I hope to see a boom in low-budget and Indy films now with the success of Paranormal Activity.Great article!
this was on twitter? viral marketing nothing… people need to see a movie every weekend and the rest just happen to be not as interesting. this isn’t about marketing but about paramount giving the movie a shot and putting up the cash for distribution. they should do this to more indy films on a national scale and see how they do compared the “blockbusters”
The only reason Paramount put up the money to distribute it is because 1,000,000 people “demanded it.” And the way people found out about how to demand it was Twitter.