Mobile Communication Slow To Go Viral Alex Gerage, November 20, 2009 Have you ever wondered why so few viral marketing campaigns ever go mobile? Granted, The Dark Knight did a good job using mobile communication to send out automated phone calls that supplemented the online viral, but few films have taken advantage of the opportunities that the medium provides. Well, Nancy Gohring of PCWorld offers an interesting breakdown that highlights why mobile communication has such trouble accommodating to viral marketing. Gohring argues that viral marketing has not taken off in the medium because the mobile communication industry is not homogeneously structured. There are multiple carriers and brands that provide unique services and opportunities designed to court customers. In many ways, the goal of cell phone companies is to set themselves apart from the competition in terms of price, quality, and offerings as greatly as possible. How does one craft a message for the masses then when a multitude of software and applications are used to receive it? Mobile communication does not function like the internet, where word of mouth can easily spread across social networks or email because everyone has an email address or Facebook profile and there are few limitations to communication. It seems cell phone users though have one of a kind plans that make them incompatible with others. This makes virals are too difficult to pass along without a tremendous amount of planning and capital by content creators for a return that is not worthwhile. To me, incorporating mobile communication is pivotal for the future of viral campaigns. In many ways, the medium is better suited for this marketing than the internet. Mobile viral campaigns can grow and react instantaneously because of the immediacy of the medium. Nohring’s piece though shows the current compatibility amongst mobile brands does not allow for this phenomenon to thrive. In addition, problems also emerge when considering that films often have promotional tie-ins with a single mobile service producer for non-viral promotions. How can a film studio employ a multi-carrier campaign while at the same time honor exclusive agreements with a single brand? I imagine that as the internet becomes a more primary feature on mobile phones, brand communication will be more in sync, much in the same way different computer brands are able to coexist with the same software. Hopefully that leaves us with better virals. Be sure to leave some thoughts below if you wish to chime in! Viral Marketing
Sherlock Holmes needs your help! August 20, 2009August 20, 2009“SHERLOCK HOLMES needs your help!” was tweeted by Warner Bros. Pictures not to long ago. Along with it, a link to a website (which is hosted on a unique IP address, meaning there is no dot com), http://94.236.57.221/. The website has a password area, which is 5 characters long. If… Read More
New Surrogates Clips/Interview September 14, 2009We have a couple of videos to show you in regards to Surrogates, but first, check out this interview with director Jonathan Mostow in regards to Surrogates and Terminator (from AMC) It’s a pretty good interview, and you should read it all, but here are a couple of great Q… Read More
Learn More About “Cleopatra” in Interactive Timeline June 9, 2013Briefly: The Cleopatra 50th Anniversary Blu-ray was released last month (read my review here), but if you’re looking for some free insight into one of the most infamous Hollywood productions ever, then the Cleopatra interactive digital timeline should hold you over. Learn about the pre-production, sets, costumes, production, and cinema… Read More
I see a delay in mobile viral due to one, it costs the user to receive such viral, and two, marketing bases itself on such a visual effect, that a simple text may not get the message across. The mobile platform is there if they use it correctly.
Does your comment pass the test? If you can answer positively to each of the above questions, chances are you have a good comment.